Trubek, who is also a professor at Oberlin College,said she herself can't read the original flowing script of the Declaration of Independence, and there was nothing wrong with students reading the nation's founding documents in typed versions with fonts readable to modern eyes.Trubek also said students didn't necessarily need cursive to come up with their own signature that gives them their \u0026quot;individuality\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;uniqueness\u0026quot; in signing legal forms either. not〜eitherは、独立宣言の原文を読めなくてもいい、学生にとって筆記体は必ずしも必要ではない、この２つを否定してのnot eitherですか？

Trubek, who is also a professor at Oberlin College,

said she herself can't read the original flowing script of the Declaration of Independence, and there was nothing wrong with students reading the nation's founding documents in typed versions with fonts readable to modern eyes.



Trubek also said students didn't necessarily need cursive to come up with their own signature that gives them their \u0026quot;individuality\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;uniqueness\u0026quot; in signing legal forms either.

not〜eitherは、独立宣言の原文を読めなくてもいい、学生にとって筆記体は必ずしも必要ではない、この２つを否定してのnot eitherですか？



〇そうです。この文について言えば

「there was nothing wrong with students reading the nation's founding documents in typed versions with fonts readable to modern eyes

だし、

students didn't necessarily need cursive to come up with their own signature that gives them their \u0026quot;individuality\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;uniqueness\u0026quot; in signing legal forms でもあるのだ」と言っているのです。